ShockTillYouDrop.com

Posted by: Robert Kimberlin on July 25, 2008 at 13:44:27

Why would they reject the middle one? It looks pretty tame to me.

Posted by: TerreF15 on July 25, 2008 at 13:51:55

i'd see why too violent, but kinda like the grindhouse era type of posters, and it would better if the posters were like actual images of the film or like of mirros facing something.

Posted by: HorrorKing97 on July 25, 2008 at 13:52:47

It is tame compared to the 1st and 3rd posters. Why they'd do that we'll probably never know.

Posted by: CostaPaulo on July 25, 2008 at 14:01:11

I like 'em especially the first one..**** censorship!!!!

Posted by: adam on July 25, 2008 at 14:27:10

funny thing the guy from 24 is on there can,t wait for the return.

Posted by: djblack1313 on July 25, 2008 at 16:40:23

i actually prefer the poster they decided to go with (even though i don't think that one's so great either). i DO like these though. i'd love to have posters of them for my walls.

Posted by: random guy on July 25, 2008 at 22:30:48

i see why they rejected them. i would as well. they are too violent and sickening, BUT, if it were graphically cool, i'd let it through. but these are just not pleasing on the eye at all.

good move, mpaa.

Posted by: Kris Avalon on August 7, 2008 at 19:49:19

The MPAA seriously need to die a horrible death. They ruin everything when it comes to policing what we adults can and cannot see. Why is is that we are the only donkey country with an MPAA rating? It's a complete waste to the industry and a headache on successful and other filmmakers like myself.